The 2027 Reality Check

Clearing the Path to SAP S/4HANA

LinkedIn Live Event Dec. 4th, 2025

09. December 2025

Key Takeaway from out 2027 Reality Check: The Deadline is misleading

The official narrative states mainstream maintenance for SAP ERP ends on December 31, 2027. This applies strictly to ECC customers on Enhancement Package (EHP) 6 or higher. The reality is more fragmented and urgent for many users.

Event: The 2027 Reality Check: Clearing the Path to SAP S/4HANA Value 

Host: CONSILIO Consulting America Inc.

Date: December 4, 2025 

Speaker: Dominik Karosser, CEO of CONSILIO Consulting America

The 2027 Reality Check: Clearing the Path to SAP S 4HANA Value

The following technical takeaways are extracted from the LinkedIn Live discussion regarding the current state of SAP S/4HANA migration.

The "2027 Deadline" is Misleading

The official narrative states mainstream maintenance for SAP ERP ends on December 31, 2027. This applies strictly to ECC customers on Enhancement Package (EHP) 6 or higher. The reality is more fragmented and urgent for many users.

  • ECC EHP < 6: Mainstream maintenance ends in 2025. There is no option for enhanced maintenance.
  • S/4HANA Legacy Versions: The 2027 date creates a false sense of security for existing S/4HANA users. Versions 1511 through 1909 have already lost mainstream support. Version 2020 and 2021 lose support in 2025 and 2026 respectively.
  • The Cost of Delay: Missing the deadline forces companies into "Extended Maintenance" (add ~2% to annual license fees) or "Customer Specific Maintenance" (add ~4%).

The "German Boredom" Methodology

US-based projects often fail due to high emotion and low structure. Karosser notes that European implementations, particularly German ones, succeed by adhering rigidly to the project plan. US teams should adopt a "boring," structure-first approach to execution. Save the emotion for the post-go-live celebration.

 

Operational Failure Points

Karosser identified three specific mechanical failures that derail S/4HANA programs:

  1. The "Explore" Phase Sprint: Rushing the exploration phase causes expensive defects later. A recent US East Coast rollout attempted to condense this phase, resulting in a mismatch between user needs and system design that required costly consultant hours to fix during UAT.
  2. Key User Availability: Projects scope key users at 50% availability. In practice, operational fires pull them back to daily tasks. If key users are not physically removed from operations, the project creates technical debt.
  3. Custom Code Attachment: Long-term employees resist losing custom applications (e.g., custom MRP lists) even when S/4HANA offers superior standard alternatives. Change management must address code retirement immediately, not at UAT.

 

The Standardization Fallacy

"Standardize later" is a defunct strategy. Unlike the static nature of ECC, S/4HANA releases quarterly updates with significant functional additions.

For example, Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) previously required third-party software or heavy customization. It is now a standard Fiori application. Companies that port old custom code instead of standardizing block themselves from these native updates.

 

The Coming Resource Cliff

Less than 50% of US customers have migrated to S/4HANA. Forecasting models predict the migration peak will hit between 2027 and 2028. This compression will create a shortage of qualified consultants. Companies locking in contracts now are securing talent; those waiting until 2026 will face a depleted labor pool.

Next Step: Review your specific maintenance status against the official timeline to calculate your potential exposure to the +4% penalty fees.